Why the Prohibition on Automatic Rifles in the U.S. Is Unjust and Discriminatory
In the United States, the debate over gun control remains a contentious issue. One aspect that often garners significant attention is the restriction on owning automatic rifles, including machine guns. Critics argue that such restrictions are unjust and discriminatory, especially when considering the evolutionary benefits of owning such weapons. This article explores the reasons behind these prohibitions and argues for a more equitable approach to gun ownership.
The Evolutionary Argument Against Gun Control
Many advocate for the right to possess automatic rifles, citing their perceived benefits in terms of evolutionary pressures. They argue that owning these weapons can enhance the accuracy and combat proficiency of individuals, paving the way for target shooting, hunting, and self-defense. These benefits are seen as justification for minimizing restrictions on gun ownership.
The Impact of Political Interests
However, the reality of gun control legislation in the U.S. is often driven by political interests, rather than the benefits to individuals. For instance, the ban on machine guns was largely the result of a deal struck by politicians to prevent legal action against the Thompson Machine Gun Company. The company’s founder, John Thompson, inherited wealth and was not concerned with running a business. The move to ban machine guns was driven by political expediency rather than public safety concerns.
The Legality of Owning Machine Guns in the U.S.
Interestingly, the U.S. law allows Americans to own machine guns provided they meet certain criteria. One must reside in a state that permits their ownership, complete a background check, and pay a federal tax stamp. Despite these legal avenues, the prohibition on carrying and using these weapons remains a significant barrier for many.
Why Owning Machine Guns Isn't Cheap or Easy
Despite the legal framework, the process of obtaining a machine gun can be both expensive and challenging. A rare machine gun can cost upwards of $30,000, plus a $200 federal tax stamp, along with a year-long background check. This cost makes it a luxury for many, effectively limiting ownership to a privileged few.
Practical Considerations and Limitations
The practical limitations of owning an automatic rifle are also significant. A machine gun requires substantial ammunition, which is not only costly but also difficult to manage. The sound of a fully automatic weapon creates a psychological effect that can deter those not at the scene. While owning a less powerful automatic weapon might be more accessible, it still faces significant restrictions.
The Evolution of Military Technology
Historically, the U.S. military itself has adjusted its stance on automatic weapons. The M16, originally designed for fully automatic fire, was later modified to fire in three-round bursts. This change was made due to the realization that fully automatic fire was not effective and often resulted in a waste of ammunition. The U.S. Army, in particular, recognized the inefficiencies and negative outcomes associated with full-auto weapons.
A Balanced Approach to Gun Control
To achieve a more equitable and practical stance on gun control, there needs to be a more nuanced approach. The key is to eliminate the discriminatory barriers while ensuring public safety and responsible gun ownership. This can be achieved through better background checks, ensuring target shooting and hunting are regulated but accessible, and providing education and training for gun owners.
Conclusion: The prohibition on automatic rifles in the U.S. is not only unjust but also discriminatory. By understanding the historical and practical reasons behind these restrictions and advocating for a more balanced approach, we can work towards a system that respects individual rights while ensuring public safety.
Machine Guns and Automatic Rifles
Today, owning machine guns in the U.S. is legal under certain conditions. However, the process is complex and costly. Despite being allowed under the National Firearms Act, these weapons can only be legally owned by those who live in states that permit it, pass a background check, and have the means to pay a $200 tax stamp and a yearly fee. These restrictions effectively limit ownership to a privileged few.
Evolutionary Benefits of Owning Automatic Rifles
The argument in favor of unrestrictive gun ownership includes the claimed evolutionary benefits. Proponents argue that owning such weapons can enhance hand-eye coordination, accuracy, and combat readiness, making owners better archers, hunters, and law enforcement officers.
Background Checks and Legal Restrictions
Access to machine guns is strictly controlled by background checks, tax stamps, and state regulations. While the legal framework allows ownership, the background check can be lengthy and the tax stamp expensive. These barriers can be seen as discriminatory and unjust.