Why Skepticism Looms Over Biblical Interpretations Among Some Evangelical Christians

The question often arises, why do some believe that Evangelical Christians lack knowledge of their Bible, when they claim to read the Bible almost daily? This perception has roots in the varying approaches to biblical study within the Evangelical community, where the emphasis on prayer, prophecy, and spiritual experiences often overshadows traditional textual analysis.

Faith without Certainty

It is true that among the thousands of Bible-believing Christians, there exist differing interpretations and beliefs. This diversity can lead to uncertainty and skepticism, particularly when core beliefs are inconsistent. For example, the issue of divorce and remarriage is a prime example; while some hold that divorce is permissible under certain conditions, others maintain that remarriage after divorce constitutes adultery. Such contradictions can be bewildering and foster a sense of uncertainty about what truly constitutes biblical truth.

Surprises and Scary Practices

One of the most striking aspects of the Bible, especially for contemporary readers, is its descriptions of monstrous behavior. Contemporary Evangelicals, when discussing certain passages, often express shock, as if they were unaware of the bronze age context and the brutal realities depicted. They appear to be less informed about or less disturbed by practices that would be considered unimaginably cruel by today's standards.

Condemnation of Human Sacrifice

For instance, the Old Testament accounts of human sacrifice, such as that of Isaac, are troubling. Some biblical figures, like Abraham, are willing to obey divine commands they find morally reprehensible. God's willingness to punish his most devoted follower in ways "that would be considered cruel," as one might argue, challenges the concept of a loving, compassionate deity.

Slavery and Child Abuse

The Bible also prescribes rules for the treatment of slaves, including the physical abuse of male and female slaves. It even condones the brutal treatment of children, which violates modern ethical standards. For example, Exodus 21:7-8 provides instructions on the conditions under which a male child born to a slave woman but taken by the master can be adopted, while female children are to be sold into slavery. Such ancient codes are unsettling and highlight the cultural and temporal distance between the biblical world and the present.

Dehumanizing Warnings

A chilling passage like that in Joshua 6, where God commands the destruction of a foreign tribe, is particularly disturbing. Even if one interprets this as a metaphorical or symbolic command, the brutal directive to kill all men and male children, take livestock, and enslave the remaining women, goes beyond any contemporary ethical standard. The practice of judging a girl's virginity based on external signs, as described, is a clear violation of human dignity and rights.

Reflection and Reformation

For Evangelical Christians, these passages present a challenge to their understanding of divine truth and ethical behavior. The realization that the Bible contains violent, oppressive, and unethical commands forces a reevaluation of their faith and their relationship with scripture. This skepticism is not merely a temporary reaction but a reflection on the complex and often contradictory nature of biblical texts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the diversity of interpretations and the discomfort with certain biblical passages are valid concerns. Evangelical Christians, like any other religious tradition, must engage with these complexities to maintain the integrity and relevance of their beliefs. This includes a critical examination of the contemporary relevance of ancient texts and a commitment to upholding ethical standards that respect human dignity and compassion.