Why No Complete Lockdowns in Canada?

In the face of rising infection rates, Canada has chosen a more targeted approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic. This article explores the reasons behind this decision and discusses the ongoing governmental strategies.

Introduction to the Canadian Approach to Lockdowns

Throughout the pandemic, Canada has implemented various strategies to control the spread of the virus. While lockdown measures have been employed in some provinces, a complete national lockdown has not been initiated. This article delves into the reasoning behind this approach.

Reasons Against a Complete Lockdown

Regional Variability:
Unlike some other countries, Canadian healthcare systems operate territorially, not federally. This means that decisions about lockdowns are made by provincial governments rather than the federal one. Alberta and Saskatchewan have faced higher infection rates and have implemented stricter measures, but other regions have kept their economies largely open.

Political Considerations:
Many politicians have prioritized their re-election prospects over the welfare of the nation. Lockdowns, while effective, are costly and can have severe economic and social impacts. The economic fallout from the first lockdown is still being felt, making it difficult for governments to implement new widespread lockdowns.

Cost and Economic Impact:
The economic impacts of the first lockdown were significant. The 2021 federal budget revealed a deficit of over $300 billion, with widespread unemployment and business failures. Lockdowns also led to an economic recession, which will take years to recover from. As a result, the current approach focuses on less restrictive measures, such as monitoring hospitalization rates.

Current Strategies and Their Rationale

Instead of focusing solely on infection rates, the current strategy emphasizes monitoring hospitalization rates. This approach aims to strike a balance between preventing a healthcare crisis and maintaining economic stability. The rationale is that while infection rates may rise, as long as hospitalization rates remain manageable, lockdowns may not be necessary.

Regional Disparities:
Infection rates in regions such as the Maritimes and territories remain low. In Ontario and Quebec, fatality rates have significantly decreased compared to the initial surge. The western provinces also show lower fatality rates. This regional variability allows for a more targeted approach to managing the pandemic.

Implications for the Future

As the second wave of infections rises, governments are closely monitoring the situation. If hospitalization rates start to rise alarmingly, stricter measures may be implemented at the regional level to avoid a complete lockdown. The aim is to prevent a severe healthcare crisis while minimizing the economic and social disruptions that come with a complete lockdown.

Conclusion:
The decision to avoid a complete lockdown in Canada reflects a nuanced approach that balances public health with economic and social considerations. As the pandemic continues, this delicate balance will remain a crucial factor in determining the path forward.