Why Joe Biden’s Delegation to Israel is a Valid Move and Not a Forbearance Issue
The recent events surrounding Joe Biden and Israel's delegation to investigate the tragic attacks on World Kitchen vans have sparked considerable debate. Critics argue that Biden is delegating an investigation to Israel, including the murderous attacks that killed seven aid workers. However, this perspective oversimplifies the complexities and international legal frameworks at play.
The Context and Necessity of Israel's Investigation
The “murderous attacks” on the World Kitchen vans happened at night, likely involving aircraft using advanced target identification technology. Despite the presence of identifying markings on the vehicles, it is improbable that these would be visible at the speed and distance they were traveling. Furthermore, the IDF (Israel Defense Forces) were notified of the scheduled conveyance and advised when the conveyance began its journey. This raises questions about whether the attack was a mistake or a deliberate action.
Two service personnel have already been investigated and disciplined, with others facing additional disciplinary action. This prompt and direct approach to addressing potential shortcomings demonstrates a commitment to accountability. Given the circumstances and the nature of the attacks, awaiting a comprehensive investigation from a party with the necessary intelligence and resources is a reasonable and pragmatic approach.
Legal and Diplomatic Considerations
It is important to understand the legal and diplomatic framework that governs interactions between the United States and Israel. The United States has no legal or diplomatic right to interfere in Israeli operations within their area of control. The U.S. has the ability to conduct its own investigations and share information, but the authority to formally investigate and discipline Israeli personnel lies within Israel's jurisdiction.
Even if the U.S. president wishes to involve himself, the U.S. cannot legally compel Israel to cooperate or conduct an investigation. This point is further emphasized by the fact that the Israeli government has already begun the process of investigating and disciplining those potentially responsible. Merely announcing an investigation without the ability to enforce it could be seen as an infringement on the sovereignty and internal affairs of another nation.
Global Perspective and Public Perception
The invocation of historical figures like John Wayne Gacy, a notorious serial killer, to draw parallels with Israel's actions is both off-target and disrespectful. Such comparisons obscure the complexities of international relations and local security concerns. It is crucial to approach these issues with a nuanced understanding rather than sensationalism.
The United Nations and other international bodies can propose investigations but lack the enforcement mechanisms to implement them effectively. Therefore, expecting the U.S. to take unilateral action without international support would be called into question. Instead, relying on a thorough and official investigation by the nation itself is a pragmatic and appropriate solution.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Joe Biden's delegation of the task to Israel to investigate these tragic events reflects a practical and responsible approach. The U.S. cannot ignore the legal and diplomatic constraints that limit its authority in such matters. Expecting Israel to cooperate in a robust and transparent investigation is a sensible and realistic course of action. Criticisms that suggest otherwise often overlook the complexities and legal boundaries that govern international relations.