Why Handguns Are Not Commonly Issued As Backup Weapons to Soldiers

The decision to equip soldiers with handguns or sidearms as backup weapons has long been a topic of debate. This article explores the reasons why such weapons are not commonly issued and examines the effectiveness and practicality of sidearms in modern military operations.

The Burden of Equipment

One of the primary reasons why handguns are not widely issued to soldiers is the significant weight they add to the already heavy load of gear that soldiers must carry. Soldiers in combat operations, especially infantry, carry a vast array of equipment, including body armor, weapons, ammunition, and supplies. Additional weight from sidearms can be detrimental to both mobility and stamina. For example, in the Vietnam War, cavalry armor crewmen were issued .45 ACP 1911 pistols, among other weapons. The weight of these sidearms was a considerable burden, and soldiers often felt a sense of loss when they were required to turn them in at the end of their tour.

Efficacy and Practicality in Combat

Handguns have limited tactical utility in many combat scenarios. While they are useful in specific situations, such as emergency close-quarters combat or as a last resort when all other options are exhausted, their overall effectiveness in modern warfare is questionable. The short range of handguns makes them less effective against modern body armor, which can deflect many pistol-caliber rounds. For instance, at a distance of 5 meters, modern body armor can effectively stop pistol-caliber ammunition. This means that the added weight of a sidearm, which could otherwise be used to carry additional ammunition or supplies, may not provide a significant tactical advantage.

Logistical and Tactical Considerations

In infantry units, the job of a soldier is not to act alone but as part of a cohesive team. Squad leaders are responsible for managing the allocation of ammunition and resources. This includes ensuring that no one runs out of ammunition, which can be a critical issue in prolonged combat situations. When a soldier runs low on ammunition, there are established protocols to redistribute supplies. Additionally, warnings are issued when ammunition levels are low, allowing for prompt action to be taken, such as refilling or disengaging from the battle.

Criticality and Practical Alternatives

The inclusion of a handgun as a backup weapon is not always critical for soldiers. Instead, practical alternatives, such as carrying additional ammunition or magazine pouches, can provide soldiers with the tools they need to effectively handle a variety of combat situations. For example, an infantryman could carry a couple of spare magazine pouches, each holding multiple rounds of rifle ammunition. This would give them more flexibility and firepower than a single handgun, without the added weight and bulk.

Conclusion

While handguns may have their place in specific scenarios, the practicality and effectiveness of issuing them to every soldier are questionable. The weight and space considerations, combined with the limitations of their range and effectiveness against modern body armor, make them less than ideal as a standard issue weapon. Instead, soldiers could benefit more from having additional ammunition and the capability to operate as a well-coordinated unit, with the support of their comrades.

Whether a soldier faces a situation where a handgun is the best option or not, the importance lies in the strategic planning and preparation that goes into equip and equip their forces to handle a wide range of potential scenarios, not just relying on a backup weapon that may or may not be effective.