What All MBTI Types Have in Common

What All MBTI Types Have in Common

Introduction

When discussing the similarities among MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) personality types, several common threads emerge. Whether one is an ENFJ, ENTJ, ESFJ, or any of the 16 types, there are foundational elements that unite them. This article explores these commonalities, particularly focusing on the cognitive functions and the underlying preferences that define each type.

Understanding Cognitive Functions

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is built on the foundation of cognitive functions. These functions are the core of how individuals process information and make decisions. Each of the 16 MBTI types has a unique combination of these functions, which shape their personalities and behaviors.

1. Alternating Extroversion and Introversion

The cognitive functions alternate from extroverted to introverted and vice versa. The first and fourth functions of each type are of the same type, whether they are perceiving or judging. The second and third functions also share the same type, as do the fifth and eighth, and the sixth and seventh. This alternating pattern is a critical aspect of how personality types are structured.

2. The Determinant of Extroversion and Introversion

Each type's primary function determines its overall attitude, whether it is extroverted or introverted. This function sets the tone for how individuals engage with the world and process information. For example, an ENFJ's intuition (N) as their primary function suggests they are more reflective and introverted, while an ESFP's sensation (S) as their primary function indicates they are more grounded in the present and more outgoing.

Common Threads Among MBTI Types

Despite the vast diversity of personality types in the MBTI framework, several common threads weave through them all. These elements include cognitive functions, underlying preferences, and shared human experiences.

1. Common Cognitive Stacks

Each MBTI type has a cognitive stack of four functions. For instance, ENFJ and INFJ types share two of their four cognitive functions, but in a different order. This shared stack suggests underlying similarities in how they process and interpret the world.

2. Similar Preferences and Experiences

The fundamental underpinning of MBTI is that people have preferences, and these preferences give rise to specific cognitive functions. While some preferences, such as a preference for red over blue, may not be significantly meaningful, the cognitive functions identified by Myers and Briggs are precisely defined. This precision allows for the creation of a test that determines an individual's unique personality type.

The journey of the MBTI from its early conceptualization to a well-established psychometric test has been remarkable, lasting over three decades. While the specific functions and preferences may differ, the underlying idea that these preferences and functions define our behavior and our interactions with others remains a powerful concept.

Conclusion

While the specific functions and preferences that define each MBTI type may vary, the common threads of cognitive functions and underlying preferences provide a framework for understanding and relating to others. Whether someone is an ENFJ, ENTJ, ESFJ, or another type, the shared experience of having these functions and preferences can lead to a better understanding of ourselves and others. As a result, the MBTI continues to be a valuable tool in personal and professional development.