Vanilla CSS vs CSS Frameworks: How Developers Approach CSS in 2016 and Beyond
In the evolving landscape of web development, the choice between using Vanilla CSS and CSS frameworks has been a topic of discussion for many years. In 2016, a significant number of CSS developers still preferred handling CSS with Vanilla CSS, relying on its simplicity, performance benefits, and flexibility. This article explores the usage of Vanilla CSS in production environments in 2016, the reasons behind its popularity, and the current scenario in modern web development practices.
Vanilla CSS in 2016
The year 2016 saw a blend of methodologies in web development. While CSS frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, and Bulma gained traction for their ease of use and rapid development capabilities, many developers opted for Vanilla CSS. This choice stemmed from a variety of factors, including performance, customization, learning, and project requirements.
Performance and Lightweight Pages
Vanilla CSS can result in faster-loading web pages by minimizing the overhead typically associated with CSS frameworks. Without the additional classes and styles that frameworks bring, developers can create lighter and more optimized sites, which are beneficial for improving user experience and search engine optimization (SEO).
Customization and Flexibility
Vanilla CSS offers the flexibility to create highly customized styles. Developers can implement designs that fit their specific needs without the constraints or bloat that come with using a framework. This adaptability allows for more creative and unique designs, which are often essential in competitive environments.
Learning and Understanding
For many developers, using Vanilla CSS is a way to strengthen their understanding of CSS fundamentals. This hands-on approach enhances their problem-solving skills and makes them more proficient in troubleshooting complex styling challenges. The lack of framework-specific syntax means developers can focus on learning CSS and its underlying principles.
Project Requirements
Certain projects, especially those with specific design requirements, may not benefit from the features provided by frameworks. In such cases, Vanilla CSS offers a straightforward and efficient solution. This is particularly true for smaller projects where the overhead of a full-fledged framework can be a drawback.
Mix and Match
Many developers use a combination of Vanilla CSS and frameworks, leveraging the strengths of both. By combining the lightweight and customizable nature of Vanilla CSS with the pre-designed components and utilities of a framework, developers can achieve a balanced approach to web development.
Current Practices in Web Development
At my current company, we continue to write Vanilla CSS from scratch. While the team is familiar with and appreciates the benefits of SASS, the constraints of our clients' picky standards and limited infrastructure prevent us from using it. This situation reflects the challenges faced by many companies in the transition to more advanced CSS tools and processes.
Personally, I prefer using frameworks such as SASS, Bootstrap, and others whenever possible. These tools can significantly simplify the development process, making it more efficient and streamlined. They offer pre-written classes and styles that can save a significant amount of time and effort.
For a balanced approach, some developers choose frameworks like Bourbon and Neat, which are more like advanced mixin libraries rather than traditional full-fledged frameworks. These tools provide the customization and efficiency of a framework without the overhead, making them a popular choice among developers looking for flexibility.
It is worth noting that not all developers use frameworks. For instance, Sara Soueidan, a well-known high-caliber CSS developer, prefers Vanilla CSS. Her approach highlights the ongoing debate between using frameworks and sticking with Vanilla CSS, depending on the project's requirements and the developer's preferences.
Conclusion
While CSS frameworks are popular in web development today, Vanilla CSS remains an essential tool for developers seeking performance, customization, and a deeper understanding of CSS fundamentals. The choice between frameworks and Vanilla CSS depends on the specific needs and constraints of the project, as well as the personal preferences and skills of the developer.