The Treatment of Donald Trump's Employees: A Comprehensive Review
For years, staff members who dared to speak out against Donald Trump's behavior have echoed the same refrain: he does not treat his employees well. Whether it's through written accounts or personal testimony, these insiders paint a picture of a president who lacks compassion and respect for those around him.
Behavior and Policies Under Trump
Much has been said about Trump's leadership style and how it affects his staff. The behavior described during his first term is often marked by vacuousness, sexism, and racism. This has led to widespread dissatisfaction among employees. Another notable issue is the White House pharmacy, which was criticized for distributing prescription drugs like candy.
High Turnover and Lack of Support
The high turnover rate among Trump's employees is a testament to his controversial leadership. Of particular note is the situation with his cabinet members, many of whom left his administration within a year and a half of the start of his presidency. By his final two years, vacancies abounded, as employees fled the administration in droves. Even initially reputable appointees were forced to leave after discovering that Trump was highly anti-institutional.
A Complex Picture
While it's true that some employees have described a measure of kindness from Trump, such as not firing them outright, this does not negate the broader criticisms. Particularly long-time loyalists like Tony Senecal, Keith Schiller, and Rhona Graff have maintained their loyalty. However, Trump's penchant for giving staff large tips at his resorts does not fully compensate for his overall treatment of employees. Today, the increased Secret Service presence likely diminishes his ability to freely distribute money in this manner.
Unethical Practices and Harassment
There are also reports of unethical practices towards contractors who work for Trump. These individuals are often hired for specific jobs, only to be subjected to unreasonable and often fabricated justifications for not being paid. One notable exception is a female employee who reported that Trump never sexually harassed her, which is a rare positive account amidst the numerous negative stories.
Conclusion
The treatment of employees under Donald Trump represents a complex and multifaceted issue, one that is both contradictory and troubling. While there are instances where he appears to display kindness, these do not outweigh the overall narrative of his administration's lack of respect and support for those who serve him. As an ongoing area of interest, it is crucial to continue examining the impact of leadership styles on the welfare of employees in high-stakes positions.