The Republican Stance on Immigration: Supporting Legal Entry but Opposing Illegal Alien Invasion

Within the political spectrum, the Republican Party in the United States has traditionally supported the principle of legal immigration. Historically, the U.S. has allowed over one million individuals per year to obtain American citizenship, and this allowance is seen as quite generous. These individuals must undergo comprehensive interviews and background checks, a process far more stringent than what underlies the recent so-called 'Biden-Harris illegal alien lawbreaker border invasion.'

Legally speaking, almost everyone in the U.S. supports this form of immigration. However, as far as illegal immigration, a different perspective emerges. Very few individuals approve of it, and this sentiment transcends political parties and nationalities. The core argument against illegal immigration is fundamentally the same: the violation of laws and the potential for criminal behavior.

Republicans believe in the rule of law, and they view illegal immigration as border invasion rather than legitimate immigration. The term 'illegals' is often used to describe such individuals as a reminder that they have not adhered to the legal process. Those who criticize this terminology may not fully comprehend the importance of upholding the law and the potential risks associated with illegal entry into a nation.

My brother-in-law, for example, went through a legally rigorous process. It took him approximately one year to become a U.S. citizen, including attending multiple interviews, appearing in court, paying government fees, and signing an agreement to not seek any form of assistance. Claims that the process takes too long or that it is excessively burdensome are merely speaking in generalities without practical understanding or experience. Personal stories like my brother-in-law’s reveal the reality of the legal immigration process.

The native citizen birth rate in the U.S. has been persistently low. This demographic challenge has created a stark economic need for imported labor. However, it is critical to differentiate between the kinds of individuals entering the country. The Republican stance is not in favor of 'imported gang bangers,' 'imported fentanyl,' 'imported sex slaves,' or 'imported labor slaves.' These elements represent significant security threats and can have catastrophic impacts on our society. Instead, controlled and legal immigration remains the focus.

A closed and controlled border would `most likely mitigate many of these issues, ensuring that only law-abiding individuals contribute positively to our economy and society. The need for lawfully imported labor is undeniable, but the quality and nature of that labor must align with the safety and well-being of our nation. `

In conclusion, while the Republican Party supports legal immigration as a means to sustain our economy and society, they firmly oppose illegal immigration. The principle of upholding the law and ensuring that individuals who enter our country do so legally is paramount. This understanding and approach exemplify the responsible and secure stance advocated by the Republican Party on immigration policy.