The Intersection of Men and Pro-Choice Advocacy in the 21st Century

As the landscape of the pro-choice movement has evolved, a significant question has emerged: why do pro-choice advocates continue to seek support from men in the fight for reproductive rights, despite doctrines that stipulate men should not have an opinion on such matters?

The Evolution of the Pro-Choice Movement

The journey of the pro-choice movement has shifted from a time when men were explicitly told to stay out of the discussion. For many years, the goal was to fight for women's rights without male input or interference. Winning significant judgments allowed feminists to lean solely on their own advocacy and activism, without the need for male allies.

Now, the narrative has transformed. The movement has shifted to a grassroots approach, relying on state-level voting to make substantial changes. In this new environment, men are not just passive observers; they are now stakeholders who hold the power to influence outcomes through voting. This shift reflects a strategic need for the pro-choice movement to broaden its base and garner a diverse range of supporters.

Manipulative Tactics and Privacy Concerns

Although the movement has always maintained that issues like abortion are not exclusively "men's issues," it is now increasingly clear that men's voices matter in the voting process. This has led to concerns about manipulation and unethical tactics. There are already indications that advocates are exploring morally dubious strategies, such as calling for a sex strike or other disruptive measures, to intimidate male voters and pressure them into supporting pro-choice positions.

The Desperate Hypocrisy of the Pro-Choice Movement

The pro-choice movement's actions and rhetoric highlight a significant hypocrisy. For years, the movement has used aggressive and hateful rhetoric towards men, while simultaneously positioning themselves as advocates for both men and women. This double standard is not only detrimental to the cause but also repels many potential allies who are wary of being pigeonholed.

Furthermore, this movement's recent attempts to leverage men's opinions for their personal gain demonstrate a complete lack of consistency. By actively seeking male support, they are belatedly acknowledging that men indeed have a stake in this issue. Yet, the same advocates who once decried male opinions now use them for their agenda. The irony is palpable, as these same feminists who were once so vocal about men's supposed oppression now need their support for the same cause.

Abortion and Bodily Autonomy: A Stateless Issue

The debate over abortion is not a one-size-fits-all issue. Abortion is a state-by-state issue, which means that restrictions and policies vary significantly across different regions. It is incorrect to claim that abortion is uniformly banned or that it is a universally recognized right. In the United States, abortion is limited, not completely banned, and the legal status of abortion can be influenced by state laws and regulations.

Advocates for reproductive rights must recognize that the fight for bodily autonomy and control over one's life course is a complex issue. Men who support these rights are generally seen as allies, especially when they speak out against the traditional anti-woman rhetoric that has long defined parts of the pro-choice movement. Unlike their hyper-critical and often hypocritical counterparts, pro-choice men who stand up for women's rights are often well-received and respected.

A Call to Action and Solidarity

As traditional women, we must stand together with men who align with our values. The radical feminist movement has caused immense harm to the traditional understanding of womanhood. By slamming the hammer down on these zealots, we assert our values and protect the sanctity of our rights.

We encourage men to adhere to the principle that they should not have opinions on women's reproductive rights. This principle, which has been consistently espoused, underscores the need for women to take ownership of their choices and advocate for themselves. By removing men from the decision-making process, we can focus on creating a more equitable society where women have the final say in matters that affect them most directly.