The Ongoing Impact of Government Mandated Shutdowns on Unemployment

The recent surge in the unemployment rate in the United States to a Depression-era level of 14.7% has raised significant concerns, particularly in light of government-mandated shutdowns. This high rate is due to the mandated restrictions rather than a fundamental deterioration in the economy. This article explores the current situation, its implications, and divergent perspectives on the actions taken by the Federal government.

Understanding the Context of Unemployment

The comparison to the Great Depression, where the unemployment rate reached approximately 23-25%, is not entirely accurate. The factors and drivers of the current situation are different from those of the Depression era. During the Great Depression, the economy, infrastructure, and social systems were fundamentally different. Today, while there is a high demand for consumer goods and services that is currently pent up, the underlying issue is the governmental measures that have led to these unprecedented unemployment figures.

The Human Cost and Social Implications

The current surge in unemployment is tragic for two primary reasons. First, it affects millions of people who may be losing their livelihoods, their financial security, and their sense of belonging. Many face reduced access to healthcare, nutrition, and other essential services, which can have long-term impacts on their health and well-being. Second, it raises concerns about social unrest and revolution similar to those of the Great Depression. The U.S. alone has had significant social unrest and even political revolution with this level of unemployment, indicating the potential for severe consequences if the situation is not managed carefully.

Difference in Leadership and Policy

Reflecting on the leadership of Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression, his competent and compassionate policies helped alleviate the problem and prevented a social revolution. Modern governance, however, is fraught with incompetence, corruption, and poor planning. While some may argue that a better social safety net could have cushioned the impact on workers, even with a robust social system, the decoupling of the business and economic community from the broader public suggests a need for reform in the corporate and political sectors.

Comparative Analysis with Sweden

Sweden, known for its liberal policies, has offered an alternative approach. By opting for a strategy of herd immunity rather than strict lockdowns, Sweden has attempted to balance public health with economic and social considerations. Critics argue that this approach is misguided and blame a lack of government foresight, while supporters point to the relative success in managing the virus spread without the extreme economic impact seen elsewhere.

The Broader Context: Manipulation and Corporate Bailouts

The current crisis goes beyond economic and social factors; it is intertwined with political manipulation and corporate interests. There is a concern that the decision to enforce strict lockdowns was influenced by powerful interests, including those who benefit from corporate bailouts and those who seek to advance certain agendas, such as left-leaning and feminist movements. This manipulation of public opinion and policy decisions is evident in the current narrative around health and economic activities.

Reading Recommendations for Further Insight

To better understand the forces at play, it is recommended to read works such as The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Jeanne A. Jones Iserbyt, 1984 by George Orwell, and "American Betrayal" by Diana West. These texts provide valuable insight into the political and social dynamics shaping our world today. Understanding these works can help decipher the underlying motives and the broader implications of the current policies.