The Biblical Notion of 'Strange Flesh': An Exploration of Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations

The term 'strange flesh' is often encountered in discussions about ancient biblical texts, specifically in the context of Jude 1:6-7. While it may initially appear obscure, the term is rooted in the biblical narrative of moral reprehension. This article delves into the historical context, theological implications, and modern interpretations of the phrase 'strange flesh,' providing insights for both scholars and lay readers.

Biblical References and Context

Jude 1:6-7 serves as the primary source for the phrase 'strange flesh.' The verse reads:

ldquo;And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha and the cities about them in like manner giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh are set forth for an example suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.rdquo;

Here, Jude draws a parallel between the angels who 'left their own habitation' and the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, who also engaged in fornication involving 'strange flesh.' This similarity underscores the gravity of the actions described within the biblical text.

The Genesis Account: Sons of God and the Nephilim

The Genesis account, particularly Genesis 6:2-4, provides the background story for understanding 'strange flesh.' The verse states:

ldquo;That the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were fair, and they took them wives of all which they chose.rdquo;

Here, the 'sons of God' are interpreted as angelic beings, and their actions of mating with human women are described. The result of this union are the Nephilim, described as 'mighty men of renown' who rapidly grew in size and strength. This interaction between angelic beings and humans is defined as 'going after strange flesh,' indicating a departure from the natural and intended order of creation.

Interpretations andModern Understanding

The term 'strange flesh' has been subject to various interpretations over the years. In one interpretation, the phrase is understood as referring to bestiality or the act of humans mating with animals. This view is based on the understanding that 'strange flesh' signifies something unnatural and not within the parameters of normal human behavior.

However, another interpretation, supported by scholars like Diana in the given text, suggests that 'strange flesh' is best understood in the context of Genesis 19. In this context, the inhabitants of Sodom are described as pursuing 'unnatural desire,' which is interpreted as homosexual desire.

The Revised English Version (REB) translates Jude 1:7 as:

ldquo;Even as Sodom and Gomorrah and the towns like them, which since they indulged in sexual immorality and practiced unnatural lust serve as an example by suffering the penalty of eternal fire.rdquo;

This translation emphasizes the idea of pursuing 'unnatural lust,' suggesting that the term 'strange flesh' can be interpreted as homosexual desire. The inhabitants of Sodom were so entrenched in their actions that they were willing to break into and commit violence to obtain what they desired, despite being offered an alternative.

Interpretive Challenges and Theological Debates

The biblical text, particularly in the account of 'strange flesh,' presents challenges for modern interpreters. These challenges include determining the exact nature of the 'strange flesh' mentioned and understanding the theological significance of the actions described.

From a modern theological perspective, some argue that the term 'strange flesh' is emblematic of a broader rejection of divine commandments and a transgression of natural boundaries. The actions described are seen as a form of rebellion against the created order, which God has established.

Conclusion

The term 'strange flesh' is a rich and complex concept that has garnered significant attention in biblical scholarship. Its interpretation can vary, with some viewing it as an expression of bestiality and others as a reference to homosexual desire. Regardless of the specific interpretation, the text serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of transgressing established moral boundaries.

Understanding the term 'strange flesh' requires a deep dive into the biblical narrative, and it continues to be a subject of ongoing theological and interpretive debate. As with many biblical passages, the proper understanding of 'strange flesh' involves carefully considering the historical context, cultural background, and theological implications.