Reopening the JFK Assassination Case: Evidence and Theories

For decades, the assassination of President John F. Kennedy has remained one of the most contentious and debated historical events, with many questioning whether Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. This article explores the evidence and various theories surrounding the assassination, including the legitimacy of reopening the case and what new findings could reveal.

Lee Harvey Oswald and the Evidence Against Him

Many people believe that Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone. One of the key pieces of evidence against him is that witnesses to the assassination did not see him or pick him out in a lineup. Furthermore, Jack Ruby is often criticized for killing Oswald, claiming it was in retaliation for the death of Dallas police officer J.D. Tippit, which is disputed by several witnesses.

Their testimonies state that Ruby did not mention killing Oswald in connection with Tippit's murder. In fact, Ruby was seen at the crime scene and visited the eatery where transcripts show he spoke to a waitress, Helen Markham, who was not at the police lineup and could not identify any of the men, including Oswald.

Questions about the Warren Commission and Its Investigation

The Warren Commission's report has long been criticized for being too incomplete and rushed. Many believe that the commission, which was tasked with investigating the assassination, was actually an "LBJ plant" designed to direct public opinion away from any deeper truths. The commission's focus on Oswald as the sole assassin has raised numerous questions about the thoroughness and objectivity of their work.

Oddly, even Robert F. Kennedy, the brother of the deceased president, was involved in his own investigation that led to his assassination, a fact surprisingly underreported. Such tragic events suggest the need for a comprehensive and unbiased reopening of the case, particularly as the seals on related documents, including Robert F. Kennedy's notes, were lifted years ago.

New Theories and Further Investigation

Research published by Lisa Pease, particularly in her book "A Lie Too Big to Fail," suggests that there were other suspects involved beyond Lee Harvey Oswald. Pease's work includes detailed analysis of the evidence related to both the assassination and the subsequent murders of both JFK and RFK, arguing that the government and specific agencies, such as the CIA and the LAPD, may have had a role in covering up the truth.

Pease's findings support the idea that there was a deeper conspiracy, possibly involving the deep state and high-ranking government officials. This theory shifts the focus from a lone gunman to a larger, more complex web of actors and events.

Questions That Remain Unanswered

Many questions about the assassination persist, including the possibility of end-stage cerebral congestion affecting Oswald's mental state. Others question the authenticity of the ballistic and fingerprint evidence, suggesting that further forensic analysis and scrutinization might reveal discrepancies or new evidence.

Additionally, the absence of a film or evidence contradicting the Zapruder film has raised doubts about the reliability of the existing evidence. The potential discovery of such evidence could significantly alter public perception and provoke a reassessment of the events of that day.

Conclusion

While the official stance is that Lee Harvey Oswald was the sole assassin, there remains substantial evidence and theories that suggest other parties may have been involved. Reopening the case and thoroughly examining all evidence, including newly discovered information, could provide critical insights and potentially uncover the truth that has eluded the public for so long.

References

1. Pease, L. (2019). A Lie Too Big to Fail.