Receiving Holy Communion: On the Tongue or in the Hand?
The practice of receiving Holy Communion varies among Christian traditions, with differing beliefs on the optimal way to partake in this sacrament. This article explores the historical context and contemporary debates surrounding the appropriate method of receiving the Euchariston the tongue or in the hand.
Historical Context
Historically, it is believed that early Christians received communion in the hand. However, there is evidence that suggests the practice of receiving communion on the tongue became popular during the Middle Ages. Interestingly, some scholars propose that the Apostles, who were present at the Last Supper, received the Eucharist from Jesus' hands rather than His mouth.
Advantages of Receiving on the Tongue
Receiving communion on the tongue has several advantages, both practical and spiritual. Firstly, it eliminates any possibility of mishaps such as accidental ingestion by others. Additionally, it avoids the potential for sacrilege, as the host is placed directly in the communicant's mouth to ensure its safe reception.
Notably, it is also argued that receiving the host from the hands of a priest and directly onto the communicant's tongue is spiritually optimal. This method prevents any possibility of the communicant handling the consecrated host, which some believe could lead to spiritual pollution.
Sanitary Concerns
Sanitation is a significant concern when it comes to the method of receiving Holy Communion. Some individuals argue that receiving communion in the hand poses a risk of germ transmission, particularly when multiple communicants partake in the sacrament. However, this argument has been challenged by various practices and guidelines that can minimize such risks.
For instance, some church traditions recommend looking at the host and placing it in the mouth with the other hand under the chin. This technique can ensure that any particles fall directly into the mouth and do not risk contaminating the floor or other surfaces. Further, the use of a disposable cup or receiver can help mitigate sanitary issues.
Controversial Issues: A Political Statement?
The introduction of receiving communion on the hand, especially during the period of Vatican II in the 1970s, sparked controversy. Some argue that this change was made for political and social reasons rather than theological or ecclesiastical motivations. However, others defend this practice as an expression of reverence and humility, as kneeling and receiving on the tongue is regarded as the most reverent method.
The debate is further complicated by the argument that receiving communion standing, rather than kneeling, conveys a sense of entitlement to the sacrament. In contrast, kneeling and receiving on the tongue is considered the most reverent and humble approach.
Practical Considerations
Practically, the choice between receiving on the tongue or in the hand depends on personal preference and the specific tradition of the church one attends. Many churches encourage the use of a cup to minimize germs and maintain cleanliness. However, some traditions still advocate for receiving directly on the tongue, provided the communicant maintains proper reverence and care.
For example, the practice of receiving the Eucharist on the tongue and only kneeling is a common approach in some Catholic churches. By contrast, in Protestant churches, communion is often received kneeling and in the hand, or seated with bowed heads and a moment of silence.
It is worth noting that the safest and most reverent way to receive Holy Communion is with utmost respect and care, regardless of the method chosen. Whether on the tongue, in the hand, or using a disposable vessel, the key is to maintain the sanctity and reverence of the sacrament.
Conclusion
The choice between receiving communion on the tongue or in the hand is a multifaceted issue that involves historical, spiritual, and practical considerations. While it is important to approach this practice with reverence and care, the ultimate goal is to honor the sacredness of the Eucharist and to receive it as a powerful gift of Christ's presence in the world.