Music Snobbery and the Nature of ‘Good’ vs. ‘Bad’ Music
Elitism in music is often seen as a waste of time and energy. My experiences during my early 20s in the local metal scene taught me that strong opinions about music often dissipate with time. The more I listened to people bemoaning music they disliked, the more they reminded me of insecure teenagers with limited understanding and tastes.
Defining Bad Music
While it is possible to imagine something that could be considered bad music, a combination of poor vocals, lackluster instrumentation, and an overall unpleasant listening experience is often the hallmark of such music. For instance, if a vocalist sounds as frail as a dying goat and a guitarist shows up with a brand new instrument with zero experience, it is unlikely they will produce anything close to good music. However, even songs that require less effort can be enjoyable. Catchy, energetic tunes can provide immense entertainment value, regardless of the complexity of their production.
Subjective Opinions and Taste
The categorization of music as "good" or "bad" is often a reflection of personal taste. Despite this, some songs do possess qualities that make them objectively inferior, such as poor vocals, lyrics, rhythm, and beats. These aspects can significantly impact the quality of the music and make it less enjoyable for most listeners. It is crucial to distinguish subjective preferences from objective assessment of musical quality.
Individual Perspectives on Music
Individuals have varied opinions on music. Some are vocal about their disapproval, while others cherish their personal tastes without judgment. Those who dislike certain music may not consider it bad, but simply in a different genre or style that does not resonate with them. Music snobbery, however, is a different matter. It involves dismissing an entire genre or artist based on personal taste or perceived lack of quality.
The Role of Venues and Context
Venue type plays a significant role in the perception of music quality. In loud, noisy settings like rock concerts or festivals, maintaining quiet can be a challenge. However, concert halls and recital venues demand a different kind of behavior. In these spaces, silence is expected, creating a more immersive listening experience. The contrast between these environments highlights the importance of context in evaluating music.
Objective Evaluation of Music
Music, after all, can be objectively evaluated based on whether it reaches its intended goals. Good music accomplishes what it sets out to do. Bad music, on the other hand, fails to do so. Assessing the effectiveness of music based on its purpose when composed provides a clear and objective framework. This can be measured through both musical and non-musical criteria.
Overcoming Snobbery and Isolation
The challenge lies in distinguishing between objective achievement and personal preference. Disliking music that is objectively good can coexist with enjoying music that is more subjective. Breaking down barriers between different genres and fostering a more inclusive and appreciative attitude toward various musical styles is essential. Ultimately, everyone should be encouraged to enjoy music without feeling socially or intellectually impoverished for their tastes.
Conclusion
The debate over ‘good’ and ‘bad’ music reveals a deeper issue of musical elitism and snobbery. While music can be evaluated based on objective criteria, the subjective nature of taste also plays a significant role. The key is to recognize that no single definition of good or bad music applies to everyone. Encouraging open-mindedness and embracing diversity in musical preferences can lead to a more enriching and enjoyable experience for all.