Is Eating Healthy About Portion Control or Eliminating Certain Foods?

The debate over what is considered portion control versus the complete elimination of certain foods has been ongoing. Many believe that limiting caloric intake and reducing portions is the key to a healthy lifestyle. However, recent studies and health experts suggest that eliminating certain foods might be a more effective and sustainable approach. This article explores the benefits of these two conflicting methods and offers insights into the species-appropriate diet for humans.

Portion Control vs. Elimination of Foods

Contrary to popular belief, limiting caloric intake through portion control does not necessarily equate to a healthy lifestyle. Eliminating certain foods is often a more viable solution. By strategically choosing the foods you consume, you can avoid hunger, reduce the risk of nutrient deficiencies, and achieve a healthier body.

Portion control, while a common weight management strategy, may not be as effective as some believe. Reducing caloric intake too drastically can lead to health and mental troubles. For instance, starvation and severe calorie restriction can trigger stress responses in the body, leading to long-term health issues such as insulin resistance.

Eliminating Certain Foods

When it comes to eliminating certain foods, the key macronutrient groups are carbohydrates, fats, and proteins. While fats and proteins are essential and cannot be eliminated, carbohydrates, being non-essential, can be significantly reduced. This approach aligns with the carnivore/keto/low-carb diets, which have been shown to promote better health and weight management over the long term.

Many people may find it challenging to stick to a low-carb diet, as the majority may experience insulin resistance in the long term. On the other hand, a diet high in fats and low in carbohydrates can be more sustainable, as it taps into fat stores for energy, leading to ketosis and autophagy.

From a food group perspective, several items can be eliminated or drastically reduced:

Sugar and Sweets: These items are devoid of nutritional value and should be minimized. Grains: While grains convert into glucose in the body, they offer unnecessary fiber and should be limited. Fruits: Despite their perceived health benefits, many fruits are high in sugar and should be consumed in moderation. Vegetables: While often considered highly nutritious, many contain plant toxins and excessive fiber, which can hinder digestion and overall health.

Fiber is also a critical issue that needs addressing. Despite being a staple in many diets, fiber is not essential for human digestion. Many health experts, including carnivores, thrive on a zero-fiber diet with improved digestive health.

A Species-Appropriate Diet for Humans

The species-appropriate diet for humans, which includes a high-fat, low-carb approach, seems to be the most effective. Our ancestors thrived on a carnivorous diet for approximately 2 million years, and we have survived and adapted to this diet. Vegetables were a survival food and grains are a relatively new invention, for which our bodies may not be fully adapted yet.

In conclusion, while limiting caloric intake through portion control is often recommended, it may not be the best approach. Eliminating certain foods, particularly those that are high in sugar, grains, and excess fiber, and focusing on a high-fat, low-carb diet can lead to better overall health, including weight management, mental clarity, and reduced risk of chronic diseases.