Introduction

The debate over open borders is a contentious one, with proponents arguing that everyone deserves a chance at a better life and critics citing the economic and social burden. For the United States, the pro-open border stance poses significant challenges. In this article, we will explore the arguments against open borders and why they might prove detrimental to the nation’s well-being.

The Economic Strains of Immigration Policies

The United States, much like any other nation, is constrained by its budget. With a vast number of citizens already in need of support, the influx of undocumented immigrants exacerbates this burden. The concept of ‘looking after all comers’ is both unrealistic and unwieldy. Here, we’ll delve into the financial implications of unchecked immigration.

Are Open Borders a Sound Financial Strategy?

It's often argued that open borders would swell the economy since more people mean more hands to work and pay taxes. However, the analogy of open home doors to accepting vagrants and vagabonds is apt. Just like a home, the country can only accommodate a certain number of individuals. If too many people enter without permission, essential resources become strained, leading to a domino effect on overall societal stability. Tax revenue, already hard-earned, is dedicated to established citizens who are in dire need. Imagine the predicament of a family that has to choose between caring for their own members and helping strangers. This scenario is not just hypothetical but a real-life issue faced by many American families.

Homeless Americans and the Debt Crisis

The United States is grappling with a severe homelessness issue, compounded by the immense debt the nation owes. Homeless American citizens, including many veterans with injuries and traumatic conditions, are left without adequate shelter and support. The influx of immigrants, sometimes without legal status and unvetted, further exacerbates this problem. These undocumented immigrants are often provided with extensive support, such as housing, healthcare, and welfare, detracting from the resources available to Americans in need.

The Real Cost of Open Borders

The taxes paid by middle and lower-class citizens are significantly redirected towards these new arrivals. Each year, taxpayers aretaking up to 35% of their earned income in taxes, a substantial portion of which is funneled into immigration support. This diverts funds away from critical benefits and services for American citizens. Furthermore, the system's inability to vet immigrants effectively means that many are not genuine refugees, but individuals seeking financial gain. Countries like Iran and Iraq, where there is a strong anti-American rhetoric, and regions with conflicts, send individuals across borders, compounding the issue. This misallocation of resources and the presence of unvetted individuals pose significant threats to the nation's security and economic stability.

Charity Begins at Home

The principle of "charity begins at home" implies that the responsibility to provide basic needs and support should fall first on the local community and nation. It is morally reprehensible to prioritize the immediate support of those with legal status over those who are in dire need within the nation's borders, especially when the majority of funding comes from low- and middle-income families. The burden of caring for millions of homeless Americans, many of whom have served their country, should not be shouldered by immigrants who may not be genuine refugees.

The Importance of Vetting

To ensure that resources are allocated to those who most need assistance and to uphold national security, it is crucial to have stringent vetting processes for new immigrants. Without background checks and medical evaluations, the entry of large numbers of individuals could lead to unpredictable outcomes, including the arrival of individuals with harmful intentions. Efficient immigration policies, including border control and refugee screening, should be prioritized to safeguard the interests of all citizens.

The Experience of a Legal Immigrant

It is important to note that not all immigrants are unvetted or illegitimate. Legal immigrants, like many others, go through a rigorous and extensive process of documentation and background checks before gaining legitimacy. These individuals contribute positively to society and undergo a thorough vetting process to ensure their integration into the community. Legal immigration policies, characterized by clear procedures and vetting, can provide a pragmatic alternative to the current situation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the concept of open borders is fraught with risks and challenges. It is a disservice to both existing citizens and potential arrivals to prioritize unvetted individuals over those who are in genuine need. By prioritizing homegrown support and ensuring the proper vetting of immigrants, the United States can better address the issues at hand and maintain its integrity and security. This approach aligns with the principle of charity and ensures that resources are directed to those who truly need them, both within and beyond the borders.